The question that decides the answer: Is it a dangerous building or structure, something blocking a street or footpath, or an open manhole or drain?
One statement on this page could not be sourced and is marked as not verified, with the reason printed beside it.
Who actually fixes it
The agency whose staff do the work and whose system gives you a reference number. This is not the same as the office that is accountable for it.
If a dangerous building or place, or an obstruction or projection on a street, bridge or public place
Municipal Corporation of GurugramMCG
Section 43(j) of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 makes "the securing or removal of dangerous buildings and places" an obligatory function of the Corporation, and s.43(m) "the removal of obstructions and projections in or upon streets, bridges and other public places".
The notified-services list read on 2026-09-29 has no entry for removing a dangerous structure or an obstruction. It notifies removal of solid waste, replacement of streetlights and water leakage or sewerage overflow, and nothing about hazards.
What that means here: Where the hazard is an open manhole or an overflowing sewer, the notified two-day water and sewerage service does apply — so describing it that way when you file is worth doing.
GMDA publishes a single grievance route for the city, titling it "Complaint Handling System, Gurugram" and offering Register Complaints, Check Complaint Status and Raise Call Back Request. Its own pages carry both GMDA and Municipal Corporation of Gurugram channels alongside each other.
What that means here: One complaint system covers both authorities, which is why a resident does not have to settle the GMDA-or-MCG question before filing. It still has to be settled before chasing, because the escalation chain differs.
Gurugram grievance toll-free line1800-180-1817gives you a reference
GMDA publishes 18001801817 as the toll-free number for its Grievance Redressal Portal, alongside a PRI number 01242653908 and a missed-call number 9873353224.
What that means here: This number is published by GMDA. It is widely quoted as "the MCG helpline", and the city’s complaint system covers both bodies, so it is a usable entry point for either — but it is GMDA that publishes it.
If the obstruction or encroachment is on a road, cycle track, footpath or open space, and nothing is happening about it
Chief Executive Officer, GMDA
Section 26 of the GMDA Act, 2017 lets the Chief Executive Officer "direct the local authority having jurisdiction to remove any unauthorised development in the notified area or obstructions and encroachments on roads including cycling tracks, open spaces, pedestrian footpaths or properties vesting in or under the control and management of the Authority", and, where the CEO is of the opinion that the local authority is or may be unable to, direct the District Magistrate instead.
What that means here: This is a second lever on the same obstruction: if MCG will not move it, GMDA’s CEO can direct that it be moved, and can go over MCG’s head to the District Magistrate.
GMDA publishes a single grievance route for the city, titling it "Complaint Handling System, Gurugram" and offering Register Complaints, Check Complaint Status and Raise Call Back Request. Its own pages carry both GMDA and Municipal Corporation of Gurugram channels alongside each other.
What that means here: One complaint system covers both authorities, which is why a resident does not have to settle the GMDA-or-MCG question before filing. It still has to be settled before chasing, because the escalation chain differs.
Gurugram grievance toll-free line1800-180-1817gives you a reference
GMDA publishes 18001801817 as the toll-free number for its Grievance Redressal Portal, alongside a PRI number 01242653908 and a missed-call number 9873353224.
What that means here: This number is published by GMDA. It is widely quoted as "the MCG helpline", and the city’s complaint system covers both bodies, so it is a usable entry point for either — but it is GMDA that publishes it.
Who is politically accountable, and under which statute
The body or member on whom a statute puts the obligation. None of these can dispatch a crew; each is named here with the section that makes it answerable.
Municipal Corporation of Gurugram
Statutory basis
Sections 43(j) and 43(m) of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 put securing or removing dangerous buildings and places, and removing obstructions and projections on streets and public places, among the Corporation’s obligatory functions.
The obligation is the Corporation’s; the executive power is the Commissioner’s under s.49. Where the hazard is an obstruction on a road or footpath, s.26 of the GMDA Act, 2017 gives a second route through the GMDA Chief Executive Officer.
This is the part that saves you a wasted month. Each limit is a limit in law, not an observation about how slow somebody is.
Your ward councillor
The Act creates one Corporation Fund (Chapter VI, ss.72–81), provides for its application by the Corporation (s.78) and for payments from it for works urgently required (s.79). Reading the Act end to end, no section allocates any sum to an individual councillor, and the only "discretionary" heading in it is s.44, "Discretionary functions of the Corporation" — a list of things the body may provide, not money a member may spend.
What that means here: A Gurugram ward councillor has no discretionary fund. There is no ward-level pot of money they can release, so asking a councillor to "sanction" a repair is asking for something the statute does not give them.
Under s.49 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, "subject to general supervision and control of the Corporation the executive power, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act ... shall vest in the Commissioner".
What that means here: The elected Corporation supervises. It is the Commissioner — an officer appointed by the State Government under s.45, not an elected member — who can actually order work done.
MPLADS exists for "creation of durable community assets", and its annual entitlement is ₹5 crore per MP (PIB, 11 August 2025). Annexure-II of the guidelines, headed "LIST OF WORKS PROHIBITED UNDER MPLADS", includes at item 12 "All revenue and recurring expenditure", at item 4 "All maintenance works of any type" and at item 5 "All renovation and repair works".
What that means here: A recurring municipal service — the garbage round, sweeping, desilting on a cycle, changing a failed lamp — is recurring expenditure, not a durable asset, so MPLADS money cannot pay for it. MPLADS can build a thing; it cannot run or maintain one.
Under MPLADS an MP recommends and the district administration sanctions. PIB, 23 March 2023: MPs "send their recommendations of development works directly to their respective Nodal District Authorities and same are implemented by the District Authorities". The guidelines name that authority: "District Collector/District Magistrate/Deputy Commissioner will generally be the District Authority to implement MPLADS in the district" (para 2.10), and set the clock on it: "All recommended eligible works should be sanctioned within 75 days from the date of receipt of the recommendation", with rejection to be communicated "within 45 days" (para 3.12). PIB, 11 August 2025, records that the 2023 Guidelines have States "delegate full powers with regard to technical, financial and administrative sanctions to the Implementing District Authority (Para 4.3.2)".
What that means here: An MP cannot sanction a work, award it or pay for it. The Deputy Commissioner does. An MP who has recommended something has done the whole of what the scheme lets them do.
Haryana is reported to run a constituency development grant for MLAs, and reporting from 2025 puts it at ₹5 crore per constituency released in three tranches, with works executed on the MLA’s recommendation through Deputy Commissioners and Zila Parishads.
Why this is not verified: No Haryana government notification, scheme document or guideline for an MLA local-area development scheme under this description was located. Every figure and every procedural detail above comes from newspaper reporting, and nothing on these pages rests on it. Two separate Haryana schemes ARE sourced to government documents and are described on the representatives pages: Vidhayak Adarsh Nagar Avam Gram Yojana at ₹2 crore per constituency per year, and a ₹5 crore provision announced in the 2025-26 budget speech for the whole tenure of the assembly — not per year. What the reporting above describes may be one of those two misreported, or a third thing; until the scheme document is read we do not know which, so we assert nothing about it.
File it on the Complaint Handling System, Gurugram and say what kind of hazard it is in the first line — dangerous structure, obstruction, or open manhole or sewer.
Which words you use decides which statutory hook the complaint gets. "Sewerage overflow" attaches a two-day notified window; "hazard" attaches none. Both may describe the same open chamber.
GMDA publishes a single grievance route for the city, titling it "Complaint Handling System, Gurugram" and offering Register Complaints, Check Complaint Status and Raise Call Back Request. Its own pages carry both GMDA and Municipal Corporation of Gurugram channels alongside each other.
What that means here: One complaint system covers both authorities, which is why a resident does not have to settle the GMDA-or-MCG question before filing. It still has to be settled before chasing, because the escalation chain differs.
Each rung as the notification or statute names it, with its published window where one exists and a plain statement where none does.
1
MCG, through the Complaint Handling System
No published time limit for this rung.
GMDA publishes a single grievance route for the city, titling it "Complaint Handling System, Gurugram" and offering Register Complaints, Check Complaint Status and Raise Call Back Request. Its own pages carry both GMDA and Municipal Corporation of Gurugram channels alongside each other.
What that means here: One complaint system covers both authorities, which is why a resident does not have to settle the GMDA-or-MCG question before filing. It still has to be settled before chasing, because the escalation chain differs.
Chief Executive Officer, GMDA — direction to the local authority under s.26
No published time limit for this rung.
Section 26 of the GMDA Act, 2017 empowers the CEO to direct removal of obstructions and encroachments, and to direct the District Magistrate where the local authority may be unable to act.
Where the hazard is water or sewerage, the notified two-day service and its ladder — Assistant Engineer, then Executive Engineer, then Superintending or Chief Engineer, then the Right to Service Commission — applies. For a dangerous structure or an obstruction, nothing in the notified list does.
14 documents, each with the date it was read. Where a copy is a mirror, a scan or a superseded edition, that is said here rather than left for you to discover.
Read as a text layer extracted from the PDF, which carries scanning artefacts; quoted wording has been checked character by character but spacing has been normalised. Amendments after the copy PRS hosts have not been checked.
This copy is updated only to 11 October 2017 and is hosted on a state investment-promotion site rather than by the issuing department. District Gurugram’s own page states 531 services stood notified as of 20 July 2021, so entries may since have changed. The Right to Service Commission’s own site, haryana-rtsc.gov.in, could not be read on 2026-09-29: its TLS certificate chain failed to verify.
Read as a text layer extracted from the PDF, which carries scanning artefacts; quoted wording has been checked character by character but spacing has been normalised. Amendments after the copy PRS hosts have not been checked.
Read as a text layer extracted from the PDF, which carries scanning artefacts; quoted wording has been checked character by character but spacing has been normalised. Amendments after the copy PRS hosts have not been checked.
Read as a text layer extracted from the PDF, which carries scanning artefacts; quoted wording has been checked character by character but spacing has been normalised. Amendments after the copy PRS hosts have not been checked.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
This is the June 2016 edition. A revised edition dated 1 April 2023 is in force. mplads.gov.in, which publishes it, refused connections from this machine on 2026-09-29 (164.100.213.140 answered on neither 443 nor 80), and no other copy of the April 2023 text was located, so the provisions cited from this edition may have been amended. Where the 2023 revision is known to differ, that is said explicitly.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
This is the June 2016 edition. A revised edition dated 1 April 2023 is in force. mplads.gov.in, which publishes it, refused connections from this machine on 2026-09-29 (164.100.213.140 answered on neither 443 nor 80), and no other copy of the April 2023 text was located, so the provisions cited from this edition may have been amended. Where the 2023 revision is known to differ, that is said explicitly.
The Tribune (news reporting, not a government document)
Reporting, cited only to record that a claim exists. No Haryana government notification or guideline for an MLA local-area development scheme was located, so nothing here is asserted on its strength.
This copy is updated only to 11 October 2017 and is hosted on a state investment-promotion site rather than by the issuing department. District Gurugram’s own page states 531 services stood notified as of 20 July 2021, so entries may since have changed. The Right to Service Commission’s own site, haryana-rtsc.gov.in, could not be read on 2026-09-29: its TLS certificate chain failed to verify.